I'm curious to know how many people actually ran it using http vs downloading the tgz. Did someone succeed with http?
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: > Don’t forget to also test Java 8! > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py --test-java8 > /path/to/jdk1.8.0 > http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC2-rev1658469 > > > > Uwe > > > > ----- > > Uwe Schindler > > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > > http://www.thetaphi.de > > eMail: [email protected] > > > > *From:* Anshum Gupta [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 10, 2015 12:17 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [VOTE] 5.0.0 RC2 > > > > Please vote for the second release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.0.0. > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded here: > > > http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC2-rev1658469 > > > > Or you can run the smoke tester directly with this command: > > python3.2 dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py > http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC2-rev1658469 > > > > > > I could not get the above command to work as downloading some file or the > other timed out for me (over 6 attempts) so I instead downloaded the entire > RC as a tgz. I still have it here: > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~anshum/staging_area/lucene-solr-5.0.0-RC2-rev1658469.tgz > > > > Untar the above folder at a location of choice. Do not change the name of > the folder as the smokeTestRelease.py extracts information from that. > > > > and then instead of using http, used file://. Here's the command: > > > > python3.2 dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py > file://<path_to_the_extracted_folder> > > > > and finally, here's my +1: > > > > > SUCCESS! [0:30:50.246761] > > > > > -- > > Anshum Gupta > > http://about.me/anshumgupta > -- Anshum Gupta http://about.me/anshumgupta
