[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12987186#action_12987186
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on LUCENE-2883 at 1/26/11 2:47 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
Let me try to recap my concerns here (2 main ones):
1) changing implementation to interface
- a different back compat policy for the module (i.e. the java interfaces
only) could partially address this.
- marking as lucene.internal could mostly address, but that's prob not what
direct module users would prefer.
2) downgrading of solr support for this core piece of solr
- making it a solr module (retaining the solr package naming, etc) should
mostly handle this issue.
was (Author: [email protected]):
Let me try to recap my concerns here (2 main ones):
1) changing implementation to interface
- a different back compat policy for the module (i.e. the java interfaces
only) could partially address this.
- marking as lucene.internal could mostly address, but that's prob not what
direct module users would prefer.
2) downgrading of solr support for this core piece of solr
- making it a solr module (retaining the solr package naming, etc) should
mostly handle this issue.
> Consolidate Solr & Lucene FunctionQuery into modules
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2883
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Search
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Reporter: Simon Willnauer
> Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> Spin-off from the [dev list |
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg13261.html]
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]