[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12987809#action_12987809
]
Chris Male edited comment on LUCENE-2883 at 1/27/11 7:31 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
bq. I would expect, for example, to be able to add a feature that probably only
made sense for solr (as long as it didn't prevent lucene users from using
function queries in general of course).
Does any of these features you allude to rely on stuff that thats in Solr core?
This impacts the dependencies this module will have.
was (Author: cmale):
.bq I would expect, for example, to be able to add a feature that probably
only made sense for solr (as long as it didn't prevent lucene users from using
function queries in general of course).
Does any of these features you allude to rely on stuff that thats in Solr core?
This impacts the dependencies this module will have.
> Consolidate Solr & Lucene FunctionQuery into modules
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2883
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Search
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Reporter: Simon Willnauer
> Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> Spin-off from the [dev list |
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg13261.html]
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
