+1

The Java 8 requirement has delayed the release of the SQL interface because
Presto relies on Java 8. I'm mostly finished with replacing Presto with
Calcite, which is Java 7 compatible, so it's not going to save me much work
at this point. But it would be good to have the freedom of using libraries
that rely on Java 8.

Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Erick Erickson (JIRA) <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>     [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14658739#comment-14658739
> ]
>
> Erick Erickson commented on LUCENE-6722:
> ----------------------------------------
>
> bq: Personally, unless we are boxed in a corner, I think this is what
> major versions are for.
>
> So does this really become "relase 6.0"? I think this is premature but
> thought I'd ask.
>
> bq: Yeah, but we have precedence. We upgraded to Java 7 in 4.8.0.
>
> That was itself an outlier. That said, it's instructive that it seemed to
> go pretty smoothly.
>
> > Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x
> > ---------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >                 Key: LUCENE-6722
> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722
> >             Project: Lucene - Core
> >          Issue Type: Wish
> >            Reporter: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> >            Priority: Blocker
> >             Fix For: 5.4
> >
> >
> > Require Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x.
> > # Java 7 is already EOL'ed
> > # Trunk is already at Java8
> > # Important Solr components such as Jetty 9.3.x already require Java 8
> > # Nashorn Javascript engine available in Java 8 is just so much faster
> and we may see more usage of JS inside Solr (SOLR-7576 etc.)
>
>
>
> --
> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
> (v6.3.4#6332)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to