[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14717482#comment-14717482
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-6762:
--------------------------------------------
{{skipMissing}} is a spooky option; if accidentally mis-used it can make you
think you have all segments if you forget to check the {{missingSegmentInfo}}
... can we make this new API package private and leave the public API unchanged?
Shouldn't we also catch {{NoSuchFileException}}?
Can you have the precise exception that was hit, and print it to the user from
{{CheckIndex}}?
> CheckIndex cannot "fix" indexes that have individual segments with missing or
> corrupt .si files because sanity checks will fail trying to read the index
> initially.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6762
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6762
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Mark Miller
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-6762.patch
>
>
> Seems like we should still be able to partially recover by dropping these
> segments with CheckIndex.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
