[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14717759#comment-14717759
]
Mike Drob commented on LUCENE-6762:
-----------------------------------
I'll make the methods package-private and add {{NoSuchFileException}}.
If the user specifies verbose option, then I added that we pass the infoStream
to {{SegmentInfos}} from {{CheckIndex}}. Current behaviour is to print just the
missing segment name - do you think there is additional value in the full trace?
> CheckIndex cannot "fix" indexes that have individual segments with missing or
> corrupt .si files because sanity checks will fail trying to read the index
> initially.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6762
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6762
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Mark Miller
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-6762.patch
>
>
> Seems like we should still be able to partially recover by dropping these
> segments with CheckIndex.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
