On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Michael Busch <busch...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/27/11 2:47 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote: >> >> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Michael Busch<busch...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Well, after LUCENE-2881 assigning the same fieldNumber to the same >>> fieldName >>> across segments is best effort - not guaranteed anymore. It looks like >>> in >>> most cases it works fine, just very rarely we get different field >>> numbers. >>> I don't see how we can improve the best effort, because I don't think we >>> can assign field numbers on flush (like codecIDs)? >> >> Can you elaborate this? I am not sure if I understand what you mean here! >> > > Sorry should have explained this better. I actually posted a comment > describing what I meant with "best effort" on LUCENE-2881, so that it's > easier to find in the future.
Thanks michael, now this failure makes way more sense to me.... simon > > Michael > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
