[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15002827#comment-15002827
]
Scott Stults commented on SOLR-3191:
------------------------------------
I'd definitely be up for trimming out funky field name checks in the tests.
Applying field name restrictions just in fl might lead to the situation where
data is searchable but not returnable, so should the enforcement portion go to
a more central location? Also, should field aliases be restricted in exactly
the same way as real field names?
> field exclusion from fl
> -----------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-3191
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3191
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Luca Cavanna
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-3191.patch, SOLR-3191.patch, SOLR-3191.patch,
> SOLR-3191.patch
>
>
> I think it would be useful to add a way to exclude field from the Solr
> response. If I have for example 100 stored fields and I want to return all of
> them but one, it would be handy to list just the field I want to exclude
> instead of the 99 fields for inclusion through fl.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
