The patch seems innocuous enough. From the ticket though it isn't so clear to me what problem it solves. I'm open to the opinion of others.
Upayavira On Mon, Nov 30, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) wrote: > Any thoughts on getting the > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6911 fix into 5.4 solr or > not? Basically StandardQueryParser's existing getMultiFields method is > a no-op. > > From: [email protected] At: Nov 25 2015 14:11:46 To: > [email protected] Subject: Re:5.4 branch created, feature freeze > in place (was Re: A 5.4 release?) >> I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in >> this branch. >> >> Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to >> this branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix >> version 5.4 will delay a release candidate build. >> >> Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these >> tickets asap. >> >> I expect to create the first RC this time next week. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Upayavira >> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote: >>> I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the >>> feature freeze starts. >>> >>> Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version >>> 5.4. I suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I >>> expect that the majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5. >>> >>> Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets: >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) >>> blocker "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased >>> authorization causes issue with replication" >>> >>> Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the >>> release? >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical >>> "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp" >>> >>> This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense. >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical >>> "Add tests for bin/post" >>> >>> Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back >>> a release >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical >>> "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 >>> (b71)" >>> >>> Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker? >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), >>> blocker "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x" >>> >>> Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will >>> not consider this a blocker either. >>> >>> - o - >>> >>> So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of >>> attention. Anyone have comments/observations here? >>> >>> I will create the branch shortly. >>> >>> Upayavira >>
