I'm done with SOLR-8355

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Noble Paul <[email protected]> wrote:
> hi Upayavira,
> sorry for the trouble. There is another blocker created
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8355
> I'm fixing that
>
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/
> LONDON) <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Fair point, I have re-worded the ticket title and summary. Will await
>> further opinions before applying or not applying the patch to 5.4 branch
>> (and trunk and branch_5x).
>>
>> Christine
>>
>> From: [email protected] At: Nov 30 2015 14:29:58
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: 5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4
>> release?)
>>
>> The patch seems innocuous enough. From the ticket though it isn't so clear
>> to me what problem it solves. I'm open to the opinion of others.
>>
>> Upayavira
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015, at 12:09 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)
>> wrote:
>>
>> Any thoughts on getting the
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6911 fix into 5.4 solr or not?
>> Basically StandardQueryParser's existing getMultiFields method is a no-op.
>>
>> From: [email protected] At: Nov 25 2015 14:11:46
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re:5.4 branch created, feature freeze in place (was Re: A 5.4
>> release?)
>>
>> I have created the lucene_solr_5_4 branch. Please, no new features in this
>> branch.
>>
>> Please update this thread with any changes you propose to make to this
>> branch. Only JIRA tickets which are a blocker and have fix version 5.4 will
>> delay a release candidate build.
>>
>> Please do review the below - and take any action to clear up these tickets
>> asap.
>>
>> I expect to create the first RC this time next week.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Upayavira
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015, at 02:05 PM, Upayavira wrote:
>>
>> I shall shortly create the 5.4 release branch. From this moment, the feature
>> freeze starts.
>>
>> Looking through JIRA, I see some 71 tickets assigned to fix version 5.4. I
>> suspect we won't be able to fix all 71 in one week, so I expect that the
>> majority will be pushed, after this release, to 5.5.
>>
>> Looking for blockers or critical tickets, I see five tickets:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8326 (Anusham, Noble) blocker
>>   "Adding read restriction to BasicAuth + RuleBased authorization causes
>> issue with replication"
>>
>>   Anusham/Noble - any thoughts on how to resolve this before the release?
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8035 (Erik) critical
>>   "Move solr/webapp to solr/server/solr-webapp"
>>
>>   This one I know isn't a blocker in any sense.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7901 (Erik) critical
>>   "Add tests for bin/post"
>>
>>   Again, this one does not seem to be something worthy of holding back a
>> release
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6723 (Uwe) critical
>>   "Date field problems using ExtractingRequestHandler and java 9 (b71)"
>>
>>   Uwe, I presume as this relates to Java 9, it isn't a blocker?
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6722 (Shalin, others), blocker
>>   "Java 8 as the minimum supported JVM version for branch_5x"
>>
>>   Looking at the discussion, there was no consensus here, so I will not
>> consider this a blocker either.
>>
>>   - o -
>>
>> So SOLR-8326 and LUCENE-6723 seem to be the ones worthy of attention. Anyone
>> have comments/observations here?
>>
>> I will create the branch shortly.
>>
>> Upayavira
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Noble Paul



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------
Noble Paul

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to