[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15042248#comment-15042248
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-6908:
--------------------------------------------
Those benchmark results are nice [~nknize]! Is the source for this bench
checked in somewhere? From this, it seems like we should switch to Sinnot
Haversine? It's fastest and lowest error?
I beasted for a while and no failures!
+1 to commit! Hopefully this means we can add {{DimensionalDistanceQuery}} and
it just works!
> TestGeoUtils.testGeoRelations is buggy with irregular rectangles
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6908
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6908
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Nicholas Knize
> Attachments: LUCENE-6908.patch, LUCENE-6908.patch, LUCENE-6908.patch,
> LUCENE-6908.patch
>
>
> The {{.testGeoRelations}} method doesn't exactly test the behavior of
> GeoPoint*Query as its using the BKD split technique (instead of quad cell
> division) to divide the space on each pass. For "large" distance queries this
> can create a lot of irregular rectangles producing large radial distortion
> error when using the cartesian approximation methods provided by
> {{GeoUtils}}. This issue improves the accuracy of GeoUtils cartesian
> approximation methods on irregular rectangles without having to cut over to
> an expensive oblate geometry approach.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
