[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15046484#comment-15046484
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-6917:
---------------------------------------
bq. I could not get @link out to backward-codecs to render correctly into
javadocs ... so I had to cutover to @code for links outside of core.
In modules you have to add {{<link>}} elements inside {{<links/>}} of the
{{<invoke-module-javadoc>}} Ant element. Example from benchmark module:
{code:xml}
<invoke-module-javadoc>
<links>
<link href="../memory"/>
<link href="../highlighter"/>
<link href="../analyzers-common"/>
<link href="../queryparser"/>
<link href="../facet"/>
<link href="../spatial"/>
</links>
</invoke-module-javadoc>
{code}
If the javadoc target does not exist, you have to add it first.
> Move NumericField out of core to backwards-codecs
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6917
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6917
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 6.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-6917.patch, LUCENE-6917.patch
>
>
> DimensionalValues seems to be better across the board (indexing time,
> indexing size, search-speed, search-time heap required) than NumericField, at
> least in my testing so far.
> I think for 6.0 we should move {{IntField}}, {{LongField}}, {{FloatField}},
> {{DoubleField}} and {{NumericRangeQuery}} to {{backward-codecs}}, and rename
> with {{Legacy}} prefix?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
