[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15051169#comment-15051169
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-6917:
---------------------------------------
I also like the legacy query to stay in core. Because the codec module should
not contain classes for public API usage. Its just a module to plug into your
classpath and SPI loads codecs from it, nothing more. No user-facing APIs. In
Java 9 Jigsaw's speak it should only export the ServiceProvider implementations
but hide every implementation detail :-)
As I see in your patch, no more build.xml changes. Cool. LGTM.
> Move NumericField out of core to backwards-codecs
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6917
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6917
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 6.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-6917-broken-javadocs.patch, LUCENE-6917.patch,
> LUCENE-6917.patch, LUCENE-6917.patch
>
>
> DimensionalValues seems to be better across the board (indexing time,
> indexing size, search-speed, search-time heap required) than NumericField, at
> least in my testing so far.
> I think for 6.0 we should move {{IntField}}, {{LongField}}, {{FloatField}},
> {{DoubleField}} and {{NumericRangeQuery}} to {{backward-codecs}}, and rename
> with {{Legacy}} prefix?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
