+1. I downloaded them all, checked sigs, compiled, tested both Lucene and Solr, ran the Solr demo.
I also just want to thank Robert for the work he did on the licenses, etc. We need to make the stuff that goes into releases more testable and verifiable. On Mar 7, 2011, at 1:32 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > Hi all, > > I have posted a release candidate for both Lucene 3.1 and Solr 3.1, > both from revision 1078688 of > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_3_1/ > Thanks for all your help! Please test them and give your votes, the > tentative release date for both versions is Sunday, March 13th, 2011. > Only votes from Lucene PMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to > check the release candidates and voice their approval or disapproval. > The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast. > > The release candidates are produced in parallel because in 2010 we > merged the development of Lucene and Solr in order to produce higher > quality releases. While we voted to reserve the right to release > Lucene by itself, in my opinion we should definitely try to avoid this > unless absolutely necessary, as it would ultimately cause more work > and complication: instead it would be far easier to just fix whatever > issues are discovered and respin both releases again. > > Because of this, I ask that you cast a single vote to cover both > releases. If the vote succeeds, both sets of artifacts can go their > separate ways to the different websites. > > Artifacts are located here: http://s.apache.org/solrcene31rc0 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
