On Mar 10, 2011, at 9:18 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: > i'm just wondering if we really need both lucene-src and > solr-src artifacts. particularly considering that solr-src is already a > superset of lucene-src ... it just seems like one uber lucene-solr-src > package of the "dev" tree would be the simplest most straight forward > thing to ship for people who want source.
At this point, I'm only using Lucene. Never looked at Solr. In the Eclipse dev environment, I bring in the jars for Lucene that we use and attach source to it. Not sure I want everything. In a way I wish there was a src for each jar. That said, I'll take it any way I can get it. And re-package it if I need to. -- DM --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
