[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2798?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15098209#comment-15098209
 ] 

Demian Katz commented on SOLR-2798:
-----------------------------------

Thanks again for the pointers!

The full test suite completed overnight, and I don't appear to have broken any 
existing tests. I believe the solution really is as simple as it looks.

I've added deprecations (and some missing javadoc) here:

https://github.com/demiankatz/lucene-solr/commit/107f6224aa33edea08a961adcb2e57b2cc96e69e

I've added a test to QueryEqualityTest which fails on trunk but passes in my 
branch here, based on your bf example in the ticket:

https://github.com/demiankatz/lucene-solr/commit/ed544b6d726e4e79319cfb5808cc3fdfde6e0f26

I'm feeling pretty good about this -- should I open a pull request, or is there 
anything more you would like me to do first?

> Local Param parsing does not support multivalued params
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-2798
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2798
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>            Assignee: Anshum Gupta
>
> As noted by Demian on the solr-user mailing list, Local Param parsing seems 
> to use a "last one wins" approach when parsing multivalued params.
> In this example, the value of "111" is completely ignored:
> {code}
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?debug=query&q={!dismax%20bq=111%20bq=222}foo
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to