Yeah, a month is fine for a release. No one has to upgrade at the pace we release, and previous bug fix releases will often come out even *after* the next point release.
We would have to spend an insane amount of effort to get too releasing too often IMO. - Mark On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:36 PM Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > I dont see how a bugfix release relates to it. Thats a bugfix release > with a corruption fix: its totally unrelated. > > we have over a months worth of improvements and features in 5.5! > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Erick Erickson > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I a thinking 5.4.1, RC2, vote just passed. > > > > No big deal either way, whoever's doing the work can decide how much > > runway they want to have if any. > > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Erick Erickson > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> My only comment is that 5.5 coming just a few days after 5.4.x seems > >>> pretty short, but maybe it'll take a month to get the first Git build > >>> ironed out anyway... > >> > >> I don't understand this: 5.4 was released over a month ago. 5.5 > >> already has important stuff like several optimizations to > >> BooleanQuery. I think it would be a nice release already as-is. > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- - Mark about.me/markrmiller
