> It is a bit stupid that the last commit in SVN was just reverted and not made > completely hidden. I would have synced up the converted repo only up to the > revision before the final *delete all* commit instead of reverting it.
I did this intentionally. This way SVN history and git history don't have any gaps -- they're a seamless transition from one to the other. The two commits... well, yes - true, they could be avoided. The repository can stay as it is, no need to rewrite anything. You could just change the position of references (branch_5x and master) and branch them off before the wipeout commit, then force-push them. At this point this would mean people's local master/branch_5x branches would be diverged from history, so they'd have to update. I don't think it's worth the hassle, to be honest. Dawid --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
