[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15130340#comment-15130340
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-7010:
---------------------------------------
Why this in NoMergePolicy?
{noformat}
+ @Override
+ public double getNoCFSRatio() {
+ return super.getNoCFSRatio();
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public void setMaxCFSSegmentSizeMB(double v) {
+ super.setMaxCFSSegmentSizeMB(v);
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public void setNoCFSRatio(double noCFSRatio) {
+ super.setNoCFSRatio(noCFSRatio);
+ }
{noformat}
> Create MergePolicyWrapper
> -------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7010
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7010
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/index
> Reporter: Shai Erera
> Assignee: Shai Erera
> Attachments: LUCENE-7010.patch
>
>
> We currently have two MergePolicy implementations that are wrappers around
> another MP: {{SortingMergePolicy}} and {{UpgradeIndexMergePolicy}}. A
> {{MergePolicyWrapper}} will simplify building additional such wrapping MPs by
> delegating all method calls to the wrapped instance, and allowing
> implementations to override only what they need.
> Also, this issue removes the {{final}} modifier from MP public methods so
> that they can be delegated properly. See LUCENE-7008 for a test failure that
> uncovered this issue.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]