[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13006287#comment-13006287
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2960:
-------------------------------------
bq. Maybe its just me, but it feels nicer to have the "live" setters on IW
compared to IWC.
+1.
I agree that live settings on IWC feels too much 'action at a distance'. It's
not a great pattern.
FWIW, live config on the IW and a static IWC feels right to me. Earwin makes a
strong argument for dropping live altogether - though I'm still liking the idea
of allowing it where it's easy and especially where it has existed.
And I've always felt unsafe publication was scary...
> Allow (or bring back) the ability to setRAMBufferSizeMB on an open IndexWriter
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2960
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2960
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Index
> Reporter: Shay Banon
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.1, 4.0
>
>
> In 3.1 the ability to setRAMBufferSizeMB is deprecated, and removed in trunk.
> It would be great to be able to control that on a live IndexWriter. Other
> possible two methods that would be great to bring back are
> setTermIndexInterval and setReaderTermsIndexDivisor. Most of the other
> setters can actually be set on the MergePolicy itself, so no need for setters
> for those (I think).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
