[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13007123#comment-13007123
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2960:
-------------------------------------
Its exactly the lack of consensus we see here, thats why I am 100% against
having the setter approach.
I'm totally against some deprecation/undeprecation loop because we in future
releases another setting
wants to be "live".
It seems the only way we can avoid this, is for javadoc to be the only
specification as to whether a setting
does or does not take effect "live".
> Allow (or bring back) the ability to setRAMBufferSizeMB on an open IndexWriter
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2960
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2960
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Index
> Reporter: Shay Banon
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.1, 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2960.patch
>
>
> In 3.1 the ability to setRAMBufferSizeMB is deprecated, and removed in trunk.
> It would be great to be able to control that on a live IndexWriter. Other
> possible two methods that would be great to bring back are
> setTermIndexInterval and setReaderTermsIndexDivisor. Most of the other
> setters can actually be set on the MergePolicy itself, so no need for setters
> for those (I think).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
