Also, SOLR-8812 needs to be resolved and SOLR-8725 I think. For those two I want to be sure we make a conscious decision to change or not for 6.0, so consider the "blocker" status a bit tentative as far as I'm concerned.
Erick On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:06 AM, David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com> wrote: > FYI Steve Rowe is in-progress reviewing my patches to SOLR-8903 & SOLR-8904 > (related to date-time parsing/formatting) that really ought to be done in a > major release. > > And there's LUCENE-7094 that you of course know about... I'm going to send > an updated patch to consider Rob's input now. > > ~ David > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:49 AM Nicholas Knize <nkn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> It appears all 6.0 blocker issues are coming to a close. If there are no >> objections I will begin the RC process today. > > -- > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: > http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
