[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13012895#comment-13012895
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3001:
--------------------------------------------

{quote}
The current ptoblem with NumericField is simply that you don't get one back 
when you do a Document.getField() on the search results. And this is why we did 
the toString() variant in 2.9.
{quote}

Right, this is long-standing limitation on our NF impl, so let's just fix it 
(store the bit); then we can use binary encoding, user can get NF back, etc.

> Add TrieFieldHelper lucene so we can write solr compatible Trie* fields w/o 
> solr dependency
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3001
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3001
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Ryan McKinley
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3001-TrieFieldHelper.patch
>
>
> The solr support for numeric fields writes the stored value as binary vs the 
> lucene NumericField
> We should move this logic to a helper class in lucene core so that libraries 
> that do not depend on solr can write TrieFields that solr can read.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to