[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9535?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15506469#comment-15506469
]
Jason Gerlowski edited comment on SOLR-9535 at 9/20/16 1:10 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
Attaching a patch making this change in CloudSolrClient.
After some poking around, HttpSolrClient, LBHttpSolrClient, and
ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient all had a "catch-all" ctor marked as {{protected}}
so this really turned into a single-line change.
Tests all pass locally.
was (Author: gerlowskija):
Attaching a patch making this change in CloudSolrClient.
After some poking around, HttpSolrClient, LBHttpSolrClient, and
ConcurrentUpdateSolrClient all had a "catch-all" ctor marked as {{protected}}
so this really turned into a single-line change.
> SolrClients should have protected constructors
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-9535
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9535
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: SolrJ
> Affects Versions: 6.x
> Reporter: Jason Gerlowski
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 6.x
>
> Attachments: SOLR-9535.patch
>
>
> Recent SolrJ changes (SOLR-8097) resulted in {{SolrClient}} ending up with
> {{protected}} ctors. This achieved the purpose at the time, and steered
> consumers towards using the *Builder types. However the change was overly
> restrictive, as this visibility prevents consumers from extending
> {{SolrClient}} in any meaningful way.
> This issue involves changing the visibility of the SolrClient "kitchen sink"
> ctors to better support extension.
> (See recent discussion on SOLR-8097 for more discussion on this topic.)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]