[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15509918#comment-15509918 ]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-7453: ------------------------------------- bq. [...] since everybody who has low-level integration with Lucene probably messes up with the DocIdSetIterator Amen to this. Also, {{DocIndexIterator}} also sounds like a sensible in this context, doesn't it? > Change naming of variables/apis from docid to docnum > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-7453 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7453 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Ryan Ernst > > In SOLR-9528 a suggestion was made to change {{docid}} to {{docnum}}. The > reasoning for this is most notably that {{docid}} has a connotation about a > persistent unique identifier (eg like {{_id}} in elasticsearch or {{id}} in > solr), while {{docid}} in lucene is currently some local to a segment, and > not comparable directly across segments. > When I first started working on Lucene, I had this same confusion. {{docnum}} > is a much better name for this transient, segment local identifier for a doc. > Regardless of what solr wants to do in their api (eg keeping _docid_), I > think we should switch the lucene apis and variable names to use docnum. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org