Thanks Michael! One quick question -- the Wiki seems to be really locked down for public editing. That's kind of strange. Anyone should be able to log in and whip up a new page or edit an existing one, committer or otherwise. I didn't have access until just the other day, and Chris Currens doesn't have access now (I had to add him to the page manually).
Can we open up the permissions on our wiki? Thanks, Troy On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Michael Herndon <[email protected]> wrote: > You never know. Personally I generally have most tech people on a list > rather directly following them. > > But thanks. > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Wyatt Barnett <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Retweeted. Though I doubt any of the ~100 people following me aren't in >> the 36 following him . . . >> >> On 5/11/11 2:39 PM, "Michael Herndon" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >If any of you follow Hanselman on twitter, please take a second a retweet >> >his on the lucene.net hackathon listed below or even send a thanks. >> > >> >"Wanna get involved in Open Source? Why not help with the Lucene.NET >> >HackAThon? http://hnsl.mn/lucenehackathon " >> > >> >Cheers, >> >- Michael >> > >> >On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Troy Howard <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> Here's the wiki page: >> >> >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Go6OAQ >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Troy >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Troy Howard <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Michael, >> >> > >> >> > That worked! >> >> > >> >> > I'm in the process of making a wiki page for the event now. >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > Troy >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Michael Herndon >> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> log out and log back in and verify permission changes. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Troy Howard <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > Re: "I'm not sure if there is a coding difference between the C# >> >>stuff >> >> and >> >> >> > the other directory stuff." >> >> >> > >> >> >> > There are a few minor code changes in the new branch vs the C# >> >>branch, >> >> but >> >> >> > those are things like framework target, copyright notices, etc.. I >> >> didn't >> >> >> > change code significantly, and unit tests still pass. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Re: "we can probably branch C# to something like pre_NewStructure" >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I made a tag right before committing the directory changes for this >> >> exact >> >> >> > purpose. It's here: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/pre-layout-cha >> >>nge >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Regarding the hackathon next week, I'd like to put together a list >> >>of >> >> tasks >> >> >> > specifically for this weekend to give people some focus on where >> >>they >> >> can >> >> >> > contribute. Some of these will be major tasks with high priority >> >>(like >> >> >> > finishing up the 2.9.4 release) and others will be of lower >> >>priority >> >> like >> >> >> > working on the samples/wiki/website... Those will great skills in >> >> creating >> >> >> > GUI apps, but less skills with writing back-end libraries might >> >>want >> >> to >> >> >> > contribute to Luke.Net, even if it's not a high priority. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I agree with Michael that we should tweet/blog/wiki/mailing list >> >>the >> >> >> > details >> >> >> > of the event. I would make a wiki page on the topic, but it seems I >> >> don't >> >> >> > have sufficient privileges on our Confluence wiki to do that. Can >> >> whoever >> >> >> > the admin is give me rights to add/edit wiki pages? My login is >> >> 'thoward'. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Thanks, >> >> >> > Troy >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Prescott Nasser < >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> > >wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > I think Troy has the structure ready to roll - I'm not sure if >> >>there >> >> is a >> >> >> > > coding difference between the C# stuff and the other directory >> >> stuff. If >> >> >> > > there isn't then we can probably branch C# to something like >> >> >> > > pre_NewStructure (someone help me with a better name), then >> >>remove >> >> it >> >> >> > from >> >> >> > > the trunk. >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > Troy I believe was investigating the legal task - perhaps he can >> >> update >> >> >> > us >> >> >> > > if he ever got an answer >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > If you want to jump into a smaller task take a look at >> >> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-372 (currently >> >> assigned >> >> >> > to >> >> >> > > me). I updated a ton of the analyers, but I believe them to be >> >>out >> >> of >> >> >> > date >> >> >> > > from the java 2.9.4 branch because I used the attached files from >> >> Pasha >> >> >> > > without paying attention to the age of them. So those could use a >> >> review. >> >> >> > I >> >> >> > > also never ported the test cases, which we definately should >> >>have. >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > ---------------------------------------- >> >> >> > > > Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 10:04:03 +0200 >> >> >> > > > From: [email protected] >> >> >> > > > To: [email protected] >> >> >> > > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516) >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote: >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > +1 to getting 2.9.4 ready to roll + the changes to the >> >>directory >> >> >> > > structure we have >> >> >> > > > > going >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > +1 for 2.9.4 and directory structure. >> >> >> > > > To make that happen, I'd like to know what needs to be done >> >>and in >> >> >> > > > what way I could be of any help. There are 10 open issues for >> >> 2.9.4, >> >> >> > > > and (apart from the Luke issues mentioned below) none of them >> >> makes me >> >> >> > > > feel that I can grab it and start coding. >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > > -Sharpen stuff - I haven't had time to get it really working >> >> (not to >> >> >> > > mention I don't know >> >> >> > > > > eclipse from a hole in the ground). I haven't heard from >> >>Alex in >> >> a >> >> >> > > while, who I think is >> >> >> > > > > the most knowledgeable on the subject. >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > Also most important to get closer to the java version. >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > > -.NET syntax. >> >> >> > > > +1, the API often feels quite awkward to use. >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > > That said, I think Luke is important. If we left with the >> >>idea >> >> of you >> >> >> > > could run Luke in >> >> >> > > > > java just find, we could also just say use lucene/solr and >> >>the >> >> api >> >> >> > > provided, no need >> >> >> > > > > for the Lucene.Net project. (I know it's a bit different). >> >>That >> >> said, >> >> >> > I >> >> >> > > don't think it's top >> >> >> > > > > priority, but it would be nice to have a .net implimentation. >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > Agree, it would be nice to have. >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > > Sergey was working on a port of this in WPF - can he perhaps >> >> provide >> >> >> > an >> >> >> > > update on >> >> >> > > > > what's going on with that? I think it was located at bit >> >>bucket >> >> at >> >> >> > one >> >> >> > > point, and then I >> >> >> > > > > lost track.. >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > The WPF track was abandoned due to absent WPF support in mono. >> >>I >> >> >> > > > adopted code attached to LUCENET-391 by Pasha Bizhan and it is >> >> >> > > > continued on >> >> >> > > > https://github.com/mammo/LukeSharp (mirror at >> >> >> > > > https://bitbucket.org/mammo/lukesharp). Testing and reporting >> >>of >> >> >> > > > broken or missing features would be most appreciated. >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > I am not sure how to resolve the Luke legal sub-task >> >>LUCENET-397, >> >> is >> >> >> > > > it enough that Pasha has attached the code or is more paper >> >>work >> >> >> > > > required? >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > /amanuel >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >
