No problem. I set up the permissions such that any user account can edit/add pages in the wiki.
This should make things a lot easier on us. Thanks, Troy On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Michael Herndon <[email protected]> wrote: > Troy, > > Confluence admin is not my forte, but I can look at the privileges tonight > and see if we change that. > > You and Prescott also have admin privileges as of right now. I'm pretty much > giving all committers who have forwarded their username those privileges. > > I've also added a snippet to the page for people to e-mail me in the > meantime if they are unable to edit the page to add to the table on the > hack-a-thon page. (And there are some who may just not want to join yet > another wiki). > > Do keep an eye out for spam once we elevate privileges. > > - Michael > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Troy Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Michael! >> >> One quick question -- the Wiki seems to be really locked down for >> public editing. That's kind of strange. Anyone should be able to log >> in and whip up a new page or edit an existing one, committer or >> otherwise. I didn't have access until just the other day, and Chris >> Currens doesn't have access now (I had to add him to the page >> manually). >> >> Can we open up the permissions on our wiki? >> >> Thanks, >> Troy >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Michael Herndon >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > You never know. Personally I generally have most tech people on a list >> > rather directly following them. >> > >> > But thanks. >> > >> > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Wyatt Barnett <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> > >> >> Retweeted. Though I doubt any of the ~100 people following me aren't in >> >> the 36 following him . . . >> >> >> >> On 5/11/11 2:39 PM, "Michael Herndon" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >If any of you follow Hanselman on twitter, please take a second a >> retweet >> >> >his on the lucene.net hackathon listed below or even send a thanks. >> >> > >> >> >"Wanna get involved in Open Source? Why not help with the Lucene.NET >> >> >HackAThon? http://hnsl.mn/lucenehackathon " >> >> > >> >> >Cheers, >> >> >- Michael >> >> > >> >> >On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Troy Howard <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Here's the wiki page: >> >> >> >> >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Go6OAQ >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Troy >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Troy Howard <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > Michael, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > That worked! >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I'm in the process of making a wiki page for the event now. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Thanks, >> >> >> > Troy >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Michael Herndon >> >> >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> log out and log back in and verify permission changes. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Troy Howard <[email protected]> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Re: "I'm not sure if there is a coding difference between the C# >> >> >>stuff >> >> >> and >> >> >> >> > the other directory stuff." >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > There are a few minor code changes in the new branch vs the C# >> >> >>branch, >> >> >> but >> >> >> >> > those are things like framework target, copyright notices, etc.. >> I >> >> >> didn't >> >> >> >> > change code significantly, and unit tests still pass. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Re: "we can probably branch C# to something like >> pre_NewStructure" >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > I made a tag right before committing the directory changes for >> this >> >> >> exact >> >> >> >> > purpose. It's here: >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/pre-layout-cha >> >> >>nge >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Regarding the hackathon next week, I'd like to put together a >> list >> >> >>of >> >> >> tasks >> >> >> >> > specifically for this weekend to give people some focus on where >> >> >>they >> >> >> can >> >> >> >> > contribute. Some of these will be major tasks with high priority >> >> >>(like >> >> >> >> > finishing up the 2.9.4 release) and others will be of lower >> >> >>priority >> >> >> like >> >> >> >> > working on the samples/wiki/website... Those will great skills >> in >> >> >> creating >> >> >> >> > GUI apps, but less skills with writing back-end libraries might >> >> >>want >> >> >> to >> >> >> >> > contribute to Luke.Net, even if it's not a high priority. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > I agree with Michael that we should tweet/blog/wiki/mailing list >> >> >>the >> >> >> >> > details >> >> >> >> > of the event. I would make a wiki page on the topic, but it >> seems I >> >> >> don't >> >> >> >> > have sufficient privileges on our Confluence wiki to do that. >> Can >> >> >> whoever >> >> >> >> > the admin is give me rights to add/edit wiki pages? My login is >> >> >> 'thoward'. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Thanks, >> >> >> >> > Troy >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Prescott Nasser < >> >> >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> > >wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > I think Troy has the structure ready to roll - I'm not sure if >> >> >>there >> >> >> is a >> >> >> >> > > coding difference between the C# stuff and the other directory >> >> >> stuff. If >> >> >> >> > > there isn't then we can probably branch C# to something like >> >> >> >> > > pre_NewStructure (someone help me with a better name), then >> >> >>remove >> >> >> it >> >> >> >> > from >> >> >> >> > > the trunk. >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > Troy I believe was investigating the legal task - perhaps he >> can >> >> >> update >> >> >> >> > us >> >> >> >> > > if he ever got an answer >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > If you want to jump into a smaller task take a look at >> >> >> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-372(currently >> >> >> assigned >> >> >> >> > to >> >> >> >> > > me). I updated a ton of the analyers, but I believe them to be >> >> >>out >> >> >> of >> >> >> >> > date >> >> >> >> > > from the java 2.9.4 branch because I used the attached files >> from >> >> >> Pasha >> >> >> >> > > without paying attention to the age of them. So those could >> use a >> >> >> review. >> >> >> >> > I >> >> >> >> > > also never ported the test cases, which we definately should >> >> >>have. >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > > ---------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> > > > Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 10:04:03 +0200 >> >> >> >> > > > From: [email protected] >> >> >> >> > > > To: [email protected] >> >> >> >> > > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Lucene.Net Hackathon (5/13-/516) >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote: >> >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > +1 to getting 2.9.4 ready to roll + the changes to the >> >> >>directory >> >> >> >> > > structure we have >> >> >> >> > > > > going >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > +1 for 2.9.4 and directory structure. >> >> >> >> > > > To make that happen, I'd like to know what needs to be done >> >> >>and in >> >> >> >> > > > what way I could be of any help. There are 10 open issues >> for >> >> >> 2.9.4, >> >> >> >> > > > and (apart from the Luke issues mentioned below) none of >> them >> >> >> makes me >> >> >> >> > > > feel that I can grab it and start coding. >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > -Sharpen stuff - I haven't had time to get it really >> working >> >> >> (not to >> >> >> >> > > mention I don't know >> >> >> >> > > > > eclipse from a hole in the ground). I haven't heard from >> >> >>Alex in >> >> >> a >> >> >> >> > > while, who I think is >> >> >> >> > > > > the most knowledgeable on the subject. >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > Also most important to get closer to the java version. >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > -.NET syntax. >> >> >> >> > > > +1, the API often feels quite awkward to use. >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > That said, I think Luke is important. If we left with the >> >> >>idea >> >> >> of you >> >> >> >> > > could run Luke in >> >> >> >> > > > > java just find, we could also just say use lucene/solr and >> >> >>the >> >> >> api >> >> >> >> > > provided, no need >> >> >> >> > > > > for the Lucene.Net project. (I know it's a bit different). >> >> >>That >> >> >> said, >> >> >> >> > I >> >> >> >> > > don't think it's top >> >> >> >> > > > > priority, but it would be nice to have a .net >> implimentation. >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > Agree, it would be nice to have. >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > Sergey was working on a port of this in WPF - can he >> perhaps >> >> >> provide >> >> >> >> > an >> >> >> >> > > update on >> >> >> >> > > > > what's going on with that? I think it was located at bit >> >> >>bucket >> >> >> at >> >> >> >> > one >> >> >> >> > > point, and then I >> >> >> >> > > > > lost track.. >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > The WPF track was abandoned due to absent WPF support in >> mono. >> >> >>I >> >> >> >> > > > adopted code attached to LUCENET-391 by Pasha Bizhan and it >> is >> >> >> >> > > > continued on >> >> >> >> > > > https://github.com/mammo/LukeSharp (mirror at >> >> >> >> > > > https://bitbucket.org/mammo/lukesharp). Testing and >> reporting >> >> >>of >> >> >> >> > > > broken or missing features would be most appreciated. >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > I am not sure how to resolve the Luke legal sub-task >> >> >>LUCENET-397, >> >> >> is >> >> >> >> > > > it enough that Pasha has attached the code or is more paper >> >> >>work >> >> >> >> > > > required? >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > > > /amanuel >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >
