Thanks Ishan for quick reply. The second link should have had the ? included in the clickable link and with that ? as part of the link then for me it redirects to 6.4.0 as expected.
From: [email protected] At: 01/23/17 14:58:04 To: Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON), [email protected] Subject: Re: mirrors-solr-latest-redir.html vs. mirrors-solr-latest-redir.html? Maybe I'm missing something, but aren't both the same links? At least they led me to the same "orangey" page and then redirected to the same mirror where 6.3.0 is the latest. On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) <[email protected]> wrote: Hello. Is anyone else able to reproduce: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/mirrors-solr-latest-redir.html vs. http://lucene.apache.org/solr/mirrors-solr-latest-redir.html? The former is the Download image on http://lucene.apache.org/solr/ (for me and a colleague going to 6.3.0 still) and also the link in the announcement. The latter is the orangey download image on http://lucene.apache.org/ itself going to 6.4.0 now as expected. Thanks, Christine --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
