I see. For me, both with or without the ?, they are sending me to the same page.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 8:31 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) < [email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Ishan for quick reply. > > The second link should have had the ? included in the clickable link and > with that ? as part of the link then for me it redirects to 6.4.0 as > expected. > > From: [email protected] At: 01/23/17 14:58:04 > To: Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON), [email protected] > Subject: Re: mirrors-solr-latest-redir.html vs. mirrors-solr-latest-redir. > html? > > Maybe I'm missing something, but aren't both the same links? > > At least they led me to the same "orangey" page and then redirected to the > same mirror where 6.3.0 is the latest. > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 8:09 PM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> Is anyone else able to reproduce: >> http://lucene.apache.org/solr/mirrors-solr-latest-redir.html >> vs. >> http://lucene.apache.org/solr/mirrors-solr-latest-redir.html? >> >> The former is the Download image on http://lucene.apache.org/solr/ (for >> me and a colleague going to 6.3.0 still) and also the link in the >> announcement. >> >> The latter is the orangey download image on http://lucene.apache.org/ >> itself going to 6.4.0 now as expected. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Christine >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >
