On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Chris Hostetter <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> wrote:
> I don't disagree, but the devils advocate argument is "given the relative > size of the change sets, testing a 3.1.1 release is likely to be easier > then testing a 3.2 release, and the patches commited to the 3.1.x branch > are less likely to have introduced new bugs (becuase they only contain bug > fixes and not new features" > thats true, but 3.2 also has better test coverage than 3.1.1 (a couple TestIdeas were worked off the list), and its in hudson's rotation every half hour. additionally there's at least one or two test coverage things we can backport from trunk to 3.2 just because... which seems more productive than backporting things from branch_3x to a bugfix 3.1.1 branch that isn't even being tested by hudson. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
