: > I don't disagree, but the devils advocate argument is "given the relative
: > size of the change sets, testing a 3.1.1 release is likely to be easier
: > then testing a 3.2 release, and the patches commited to the 3.1.x branch
: > are less likely to have introduced new bugs (becuase they only contain bug
: > fixes and not new features"

: thats true, but 3.2 also has better test coverage than 3.1.1 (a couple
: TestIdeas were worked off the list), and its in hudson's rotation
: every half hour.

+1 ... no argument.


-Hoss

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to