[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15867877#comment-15867877
]
Jan Høydahl commented on LUCENE-7696:
-------------------------------------
One clear reason to move stuff over is that Nutch and Tika do not point to the
earliest releases in {{lucene}} from their download pages at all, so their
history is not complete.
> Remove ancient projects from the dist area
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7696
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7696
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: general/website
> Reporter: Jan Høydahl
> Labels: archive, dist, download
>
> In https://archive.apache.org/dist/lucene/ we have these folders:
> {noformat}
> [DIR] hadoop/ 2008-01-22 23:40 -
> [DIR] java/ 2017-02-14 08:33 -
> [DIR] mahout/ 2015-02-17 20:27 -
> [DIR] nutch/ 2015-02-17 20:29 -
> [DIR] pylucene/ 2017-02-13 22:00 -
> [DIR] solr/ 2017-02-14 08:33 -
> [DIR] tika/ 2015-02-17 20:29 -
> [ ] KEYS 2016-08-30 09:59 148K
> {noformat}
> Nobody will expect to find hadoop, mahout, nutch and tika here anymore, so
> why not clean up?
> I double checked, and both https://archive.apache.org/dist/hadoop/core/ and
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/mahout/ have a full copy of all releases, so
> we lose nothing.
> For https://archive.apache.org/dist/nutch/, they do not have 0.6-0.8 releases
> that we have under lucene, and https://archive.apache.org/dist/tika/ do not
> have v0.2-0.7 that only exists with us. For these two projects we could ask
> their PMC to copy over the early versions and then we nuk'em?
> Any other reason to keep these in the lucene area?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
