[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7696?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15868652#comment-15868652
]
Jan Høydahl commented on LUCENE-7696:
-------------------------------------
Important to note that the mirrors and the main Apache dist site
http://www.apache.org/dist/lucene/ have a {{.htaccess}} redirect for mahout,
nutch and tika, and do not contain hadoop at all. So it is only those that dig
for archived versions inside dist/lucene that will ever land here, no route
from the TLP sites...
The Hadoop TLP issue is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1477
The Mahout TLP issue is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2643
The Tika TLP issue is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2692 but it
does not mention archives
The Nutch TLP issue is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2693, no
discussion about archives
Suggest I start by sending an email to private@ for Tika, then see what they
say before we tackle the other projects.
> Remove ancient projects from the dist area
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7696
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7696
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: general/website
> Reporter: Jan Høydahl
> Labels: archive, dist, download
>
> In https://archive.apache.org/dist/lucene/ we have these folders:
> {noformat}
> [DIR] hadoop/ 2008-01-22 23:40 -
> [DIR] java/ 2017-02-14 08:33 -
> [DIR] mahout/ 2015-02-17 20:27 -
> [DIR] nutch/ 2015-02-17 20:29 -
> [DIR] pylucene/ 2017-02-13 22:00 -
> [DIR] solr/ 2017-02-14 08:33 -
> [DIR] tika/ 2015-02-17 20:29 -
> [ ] KEYS 2016-08-30 09:59 148K
> {noformat}
> Nobody will expect to find hadoop, mahout, nutch and tika here anymore, so
> why not clean up?
> I double checked, and both https://archive.apache.org/dist/hadoop/core/ and
> https://archive.apache.org/dist/mahout/ have a full copy of all releases, so
> we lose nothing.
> For https://archive.apache.org/dist/nutch/, they do not have 0.6-0.8 releases
> that we have under lucene, and https://archive.apache.org/dist/tika/ do not
> have v0.2-0.7 that only exists with us. For these two projects we could ask
> their PMC to copy over the early versions and then we nuk'em?
> Any other reason to keep these in the lucene area?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
