[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15888374#comment-15888374
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on SOLR-9876:
--------------------------------------

Github user dennisgove commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/126#discussion_r103494004
  
    --- Diff: solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/facet/SlotAcc.java ---
    @@ -394,7 +394,16 @@ public CountSlotAcc(FacetContext fcontext) {
       int[] result;
       public CountSlotArrAcc(FacetContext fcontext, int numSlots) {
         super(fcontext);
    -    result = new int[numSlots];
    +    
    +    String key = fcontext.level + this.getClass().getSimpleName();
    +    result = (int[]) fcontext.getReusable(key);
    +    if (result == null || result.length < numSlots) {
    +      result = new int[numSlots];
    +      fcontext.addReusable(key, result);
    --- End diff --
    
    If null != result is it reasonable to reset the value under the key to the 
newly created array?


> Reuse CountSlotArrAcc internal array for same level subFacets
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-9876
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9876
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: Facet Module
>    Affects Versions: master (7.0)
>            Reporter: Rustam Hashimov
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: master (7.0)
>
>
> All facet processors are processed sequentially. We can reuse CountSlotArrAcc 
> internal array across same level facet processors instead of reallocating new 
> array for each.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to