[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15931754#comment-15931754
 ] 

Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-10265:
---------------------------------------

Hmmm, could we take a step in that direction now? Off the top of my head on 
Sunday morning before coffee has really kicked in, so maybe nonsense.

Anyway, it seems like we have two sets of operations here, what about splitting 
them out? The state change messages go into memory and the Collections-level 
calls like "create collection", "addreplica" and the like continue to use the 
Overseer queue. Seems like that would allow us to then build robustness into 
the collection-level ops "sometime" and have them nicely isolated.

> Overseer can become the bottleneck in very large clusters
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-10265
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10265
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Varun Thacker
>
> Let's say we have a large cluster. Some numbers:
> - To ingest the data at the volume we want to I need roughly a 600 shard 
> collection.
> - Index into the collection for 1 hour and then create a new collection 
> - For a 30 days retention window with these numbers we would end up wth  
> ~400k cores in the cluster
> - Just a rolling restart of this cluster can take hours because the overseer 
> queue gets backed up. If a few nodes looses connectivity to ZooKeeper then 
> also we can end up with lots of messages in the Overseer queue
> With some tests here are the two high level problems we have identified:
> 1> How fast can the overseer process operations:
> The rate at which the overseer processes events is too slow at this scale. 
> I ran {{OverseerTest#testPerformance}} which creates 10 collections ( 1 shard 
> 1 replica ) and generates 20k state change events. The test took 119 seconds 
> to run on my machine which means ~170 events a second. Let's say a server can 
> process 5x of my machine so 1k events a second. 
> Total events generated by a 400k replica cluster = 400k * 4 ( state changes 
> till replica become active ) = 1.6M / 1k events a second will be 1600 minutes.
> Second observation was that the rate at which the overseer can process events 
> slows down when the number of items in the queue gets larger
> I ran the same {{OverseerTest#testPerformance}} but changed the number of 
> events generated to 2000 instead. The test took only 5 seconds to run. So it 
> was a lot faster than the test run which generated 20k events
> 2> State changes overwhelming ZK:
> For every state change Solr is writing out a big state.json to zookeeper. 
> This can lead to the zookeeper transaction logs going out of control even 
> with auto purging etc set . 
> I haven't debugged why the transaction logs ran into terabytes without taking 
> into snapshots but this was my assumption based on the other problems we 
> observed



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to