Ok let's give it a try. I'll test the artifacts by Sunday. Shai
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Michael McCandless < [email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Shai Erera <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Only thought that we might want to give people time to ensure that > > things that are important to them are included in 3.2. > > I know this approach is tempting, and what we "normally" do, but I > think this is the core problem of why our releases drag out so long. > > I think we should in fact do the reverse: simply "release" frequently > off of our stable branch, whatever point it's at, without waiting for > anything except blockers. This is the huge benefit of having a > separate stable branch ("always releasable"), and we have yet to tap > that. > > I too have things I want to commit (eg, the single-pass grouping > collector, maybe nested docs soon, etc.), but these can just as well > wait for 3.3. > > If we know we will have frequent releases going forward then suddenly > it's much less important to squeeze stuff in to a given release; just > catch the next one. It's sort of chicken-and-egg :) > > +1 to release. > > Mike > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
