You're right; it shouldn't be shoved in at the last second -- I didn't mean to imply that. It should be committed and then we'll give it a comfortable amount of time. When that time is up, and if v3.2 waits for it, then 3.2 will probably be at about the 3-month mark since the last release -- in my view (and Grant's) the ideal suite-spot for a release window.
Releasing too fast / too infrequent aside, I think a X.X release should have a notable feature (or a huge performance improvement), and 3.2 doesn't without result grouping, IMO. It's got plumbing and bug fixes. ~ David Smiley ----- Author: https://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server/book -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Lucene-Solr-3-2-0-tp2993434p2997968.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
