[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16006376#comment-16006376
]
James Dyer commented on SOLR-10617:
-----------------------------------
bq. The idea here is that an object array would be placed in the Tuple under
the field name.
How about type conversion? In this class we're going to pains to convert all
the sql types to the 4 supported tuple types? Wouldn't the elements of the
Array be subject to type conversion also? My concern here is the Array
functionality might not work as intended. I do not see where it is documented
or tested.
> JDBCStream: support more data types
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10617
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10617
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: SolrJ
> Reporter: James Dyer
> Assignee: James Dyer
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-10617.patch, SOLR-10617.patch, SOLR-10617.patch
>
>
> It would be nice if JDBCStream could support Decimal types as well as
> Timestamp-related types, and CLOBs.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
