[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16006544#comment-16006544
]
James Dyer commented on SOLR-10617:
-----------------------------------
[~joel.bernstein] I would rather not expand the scope of this issue to address
additional concerns, but we can follow up with more tickets as needed. I only
bring up the Array support because it is in the same part of the code, yet the
spirit of the implementation didn't match the rest of the class. If its
intended as an internal-only feature, that is fine to me. I only wish there
were a comment in there saying as much. In the future, it might be nice to
(better) support Array types from external sources, but this could be a lot of
work for what might prove to be a niche use-case.
Do you see anything done here that blocks the efforts on the 3 items you
mention? Any reason why this can't be committed now? Without BigDecimal
support, its very difficult to work with numeric types from db2 and Oracle.
The date/time/clob types would also be very helpful if we could support these
near-term.
> JDBCStream: support more data types
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10617
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10617
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: SolrJ
> Reporter: James Dyer
> Assignee: James Dyer
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: SOLR-10617.patch, SOLR-10617.patch, SOLR-10617.patch
>
>
> It would be nice if JDBCStream could support Decimal types as well as
> Timestamp-related types, and CLOBs.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
