[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16008523#comment-16008523
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-10675:
---------------------------------
bq. I think this is good. I'm not totally sold on the DRAFT watermark, but it
does get the point across and it doesn't obscure any text ...
exactly, and if we decide it's not subtle enough, we can always tweak the image.
Personally i love the watermark -- no one can ever again claim they didn't
realize something wasn't the "official" guide. I was hoping we could include
it in the PDF too, but aparently it doesn't work with asciidoctorJ...
*
https://github.com/asciidoctor/asciidoctor-pdf/blob/master/docs/theming-guide.adoc
*
http://discuss.asciidoctor.org/Asciidoctor-YAML-style-file-for-PDF-and-maven-td3849.html
> differentiate DRAFT builds of the html/pdf ref-guides vs the official releases
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10675
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10675
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: documentation
> Reporter: Hoss Man
> Fix For: 6.6, master (7.0)
>
> Attachments: draft-background.png, SOLR-10675.patch
>
>
> We should tweak the build system for the new ref guide so that it's obvious
> from the artifacts when they are unofficial "DRAFT" copies (default) vs
> official releases
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
