David, Regarding SOLR-10004, those warnings are due to missing javadocs descriptions. I've added javadocs for a few classes to see if the warnings for those files disappear. If that is actually the root cause for this, we have three options ahead of us:
1. Lets add descriptions to all affected classes before the next RC. 2. Lets either suppress those warnings or mentally ignore them ourselves. 3. Edit the warning message appropriately at the smoke tester to make the cause clearly. I suggest we go with the next RC, and try option 3. Thoughts? Regards, Ishan On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < [email protected]> wrote: > > -1 on my own new example :-( > > Okay, lets re-spin. > > > I still get the javadocs warning I last reported but I'll accept that as > the new(?) normal. > > I couldn't understand why it was happening or how to fix it. SOLR-10004. > The package-info.java files are present, so I can't understand why these > files are missing. Would really appreciate if someone knowledgeable can > kindly look into this before the next RC. > > > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> -1 on my own new example :-( >> >> DIH Atom example suddenly no longer works because StackOverflow has >> JUST moved to https and our URL pulling implementation apparently does >> not follow the redirect and fails silently. >> https://stackoverflow.blog/2017/05/22/stack-overflow-flipped >> -switch-https/ >> >> The change is 1 character in the >> example/example-DIH/solr/atom/conf/atom-data-config.xml from "http" in >> the url to "https". I've committed it to master, branch_6x and >> branch_6_6 just now. >> >> Regards, >> Alex. >> P.s. The logs also complain about other libraries not loaded (for >> different DIH cores), but I think that's a long standing issue and is >> not a blocker. >> ---- >> http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and >> experienced >> >> >> On 24 May 2017 at 23:50, David Smiley <[email protected]> wrote: >> > +1 >> > >> > SUCCESS! [0:54:26.342469] >> > >> > I still get the javadocs warning I last reported but I'll accept that >> as the >> > new(?) normal. >> > ~ David >> > >> > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 2:58 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Please vote for release candidate 2 for Lucene/Solr 6.6.0 >> >> >> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from: >> >> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6. >> 6.0-RC2-rev87107084c3a90f7ef253c00423b12cc1790f8c2f >> >> >> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command: >> >> >> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py \ >> >> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6. >> 6.0-RC2-rev87107084c3a90f7ef253c00423b12cc1790f8c2f >> >> >> >> Here's my +1 >> >> SUCCESS! [0:58:58.949598] >> >> >> > -- >> > Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker >> > LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book: >> > http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >
