[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16049126#comment-16049126
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-9565:
-----------------------------------
You can already call Config API with {{add-updateprocessor}}, see
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/config-api.html#ConfigAPI-Whatabout_updateRequestProcessorChain_
and then use the name you selected in {{&processor=myName}}, so perhaps this
is good enough even if it requires two steps?
About making all URPs available implicitly I think that SPI can do much of the
heavy-lifting here and then the {{add-updateprocessor}} can accept
{{"id":"urp-spi-name"}} as alternative to {{"class":"solr.MyURPFactory"}}
> Make every UpdateRequestProcessor available implicitly
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-9565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9565
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Noble Paul
>
> Now that we can 'construct' the URP chains through request parameters, we
> should make all the URPs available automatically. The next challenge is to
> make them read the configuration from request parameters as well
> to access {{HTMLStripFieldUpdateProcessorFactory}} the parameter could be
> {{processor=HTMLStripField}} (The UpdateProcessorFactory part is
> automatically appended )
> The next step is to make the URPs accept request parameters instead of just
> configuration parameters e.g:
> {{processor=HTMLStripField&HTMLStripField.fieldName=<some-field>}}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
