[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-10844:
----------------------------
Description:
As discovered when working on SOLR-10807: if you change all existing test
configs to use FooPointField instead of TrieFooField, you get odd failures when
{{group.facet}} is used in conjunction with grouping on a point field (even if
the group.facet field is a string field)
----
Actually: the problem may be more nuanced. In general the grouping code seems
to have hardcoded assumptions about the DV type it will get for the grouping
field when doing group.facet that can fail even if the field is single valued
Trie field with docValues.
was:
As discovered when working on SOLR-10807: if you change all existing test
configs to use FooPointField instead of TrieFooField, you get odd failures when
{{group.facet}} is used in conjunction with grouping on a point field (even if
the group.facet field is a string field)
Summary: group.facet failures when the grouping field is Points based
(or Trie w/docValues??) (was: group.facet failures when the grouping field is
Points based)
updated summary & description to note that as i work on SOLR-10864 and increase
the randomization points & docValues i've found similar looking errors from
single valued trie fields w/docValues=true (in the pre-existing tests, the
numeric fields used were only ever using the FieldCache)
> group.facet failures when the grouping field is Points based (or Trie
> w/docValues??)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10844
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10844
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Hoss Man
> Attachments: SOLR-10844.patch
>
>
> As discovered when working on SOLR-10807: if you change all existing test
> configs to use FooPointField instead of TrieFooField, you get odd failures
> when {{group.facet}} is used in conjunction with grouping on a point field
> (even if the group.facet field is a string field)
> ----
> Actually: the problem may be more nuanced. In general the grouping code
> seems to have hardcoded assumptions about the DV type it will get for the
> grouping field when doing group.facet that can fail even if the field is
> single valued Trie field with docValues.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
