[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16059696#comment-16059696
 ] 

Hoss Man commented on SOLR-10807:
---------------------------------

FWIW: now that SOLR-10864 has landed on master, I'm probably going to abandon 
the jira/SOLR-10807 branch (which has served it's purpose for experimentation) 
and move forward with multiple individual sub-tasks focusing on adding the 
(new) randomized variables into more and more schema files/tests in small 
chunks untill we have them everywhere.

>  Randomize PointFields in all tests unless explicit reason not to
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-10807
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10807
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Task
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Hoss Man
>            Assignee: Hoss Man
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: master (7.0)
>
>         Attachments: 
> core.test.log.fde06f34b7f9d0916a134b3efaa8780892ff8e39.txt, core.test.log.txt
>
>
> We need to seriously beef up our testing of PointFields to figure out what 
> Solr features don't currently work with PointFields.
> The existing Trie/Point randomization logic in SolrTestCaseJ4 is a good start 
> -- but only a handful of schema files leverage it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to