Is it worth to push https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10986 fixes regression in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6357 into 7.0?
On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > Hi Anshum, I'd like to do https://issues.apache.org/ > jira/browse/LUCENE-7899 for 7.0; it's a simple rename, which I think we > should do on major release. I'll get a patch up shortly. > > Thanks, > > Mike McCandless > > http://blog.mikemccandless.com > > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> > wrote: > >> Sure Ab, this is an important bug fix. >> >> -Anshum >> >> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:35 AM Andrzej Białecki < >> andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> wrote: >> >>> SOLR-10878 and SOLR-10879 didn’t make it before the branches were cut, >>> but I think they should be included in 7x and 7_0 - I’m going to >>> cherry-pick the commits from master. >>> >>> On 3 Jul 2017, at 22:29, Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I just wanted to call it out and remove any confusions around the fact >>> that we shouldn’t we committing ‘new features’ to branch_7_0. As far as >>> whatever was already agreed upon in previous communications, let’s get that >>> stuff in if it’s ready or almost there. For everything else, kindly check >>> before you commit to the release branch. >>> >>> Let us make sure that the bugs and edge cases are all taken care of, the >>> deprecations, and cleanups too. >>> >>> P.S: Feel free to commit bug fixes without checking, but make sure that >>> we aren’t hiding features in those commits. >>> >>> >>> -Anshum >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev
