Sure Mikhail, and Mike.

-Anshum



> On Jul 5, 2017, at 5:09 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Is it worth to push https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10986 
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10986> fixes regression in 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6357 
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6357> into 7.0?  
> 
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Michael McCandless 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hi Anshum, I'd like to do https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899 
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7899> for 7.0; it's a simple 
> rename, which I think we should do on major release.  I'll get a patch up 
> shortly.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mike McCandless
> 
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com <http://blog.mikemccandless.com/>
> 
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Anshum Gupta <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Sure Ab, this is an important bug fix.
> 
> -Anshum
> 
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 9:35 AM Andrzej Białecki 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> 
> wrote:
> SOLR-10878 and SOLR-10879 didn’t make it before the branches were cut, but I 
> think they should be included in 7x and 7_0 - I’m going to cherry-pick the 
> commits from master.
> 
>> On 3 Jul 2017, at 22:29, Anshum Gupta <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I just wanted to call it out and remove any confusions around the fact that 
>> we shouldn’t we committing ‘new features’ to branch_7_0. As far as whatever 
>> was already agreed upon in previous communications, let’s get that stuff in 
>> if it’s ready or almost there. For everything else, kindly check before you 
>> commit to the release branch.
>> 
>> Let us make sure that the bugs and edge cases are all taken care of, the 
>> deprecations, and cleanups too.
>> 
>> P.S: Feel free to commit bug fixes without checking, but make sure that we 
>> aren’t hiding features in those commits.
>> 
>> 
>> -Anshum
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sincerely yours
> Mikhail Khludnev

Reply via email to