[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16143670#comment-16143670
 ] 

Amrit Sarkar commented on SOLR-11003:
-------------------------------------

The patch is failing on {{master}} and previous versions:  {{branch_6_5}}

{code}
[junit4]   2> Caused by: java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: 
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException: Error 
from server at https://127.0.0.1:55565/solr/cdcr-cluster1_shard1_replica1: 
Invalid shift value (64) in prefixCoded bytes (is encoded value really an INT?)
   [junit4]   2>        at 
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.report(FutureTask.java:122)
   [junit4]   2>        at 
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:192)
   [junit4]   2>        at 
org.apache.solr.handler.CdcrRequestHandler.handleCollectionCheckpointAction(CdcrRequestHandler.java:414)
   [junit4]   2>        ... 34 more 
{code}

bq. Invalid shift value (64) in prefixCoded bytes (is encoded value really an 
INT?)

Need to fix this for {{CollectionCheckpoint}}.

> Enabling bi-directional CDCR active-active clusters
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-11003
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11003
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: CDCR
>            Reporter: Amrit Sarkar
>            Assignee: Varun Thacker
>         Attachments: sample-configs.zip, SOLR-11003.patch, SOLR-11003.patch, 
> SOLR-11003-tlogutils.patch
>
>
> The latest version of Solr CDCR across collections / clusters is in 
> active-passive format, where we can index into source collection and the 
> updates gets forwarded to the passive one and vice-versa is not supported.
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/cross-data-center-replication-cdcr.html
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6273
> We are try to get a  design ready to index in both collections and the 
> updates gets reflected across the collections in real-time. 
> ClusterACollectionA => ClusterBCollectionB | ClusterBCollectionB => 
> ClusterACollectionA.
> The best use-case would be to we keep indexing in ClusterACollectionA which 
> forwards the updates to ClusterBCollectionB. If ClusterACollectionA gets 
> down, we point the indexer and searcher application to ClusterBCollectionB. 
> Once ClusterACollectionA is up, depending on updates count, they will be 
> bootstrapped or forwarded to ClusterACollectionA from ClusterBCollectionB and 
> keep indexing on the ClusterBCollectionB.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to