[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16144175#comment-16144175
 ] 

Erick Erickson commented on SOLR-11003:
---------------------------------------

Well, it was a nice theory, too bad it's not true. I added a loop in the test 
(on master, but I don't think that matters) where if the document counts don't 
match, I add one more doc to the source and go back around the 
WaitForTargetToSync loop again. 

At the initial failure I see counts of
target: 1901
source: 2000

After my new loop I see counts of
target: 1902
source: 2001

Clearly my new doc is being indexed to the source and sent to the target so 
it's not just a matter of the docs getting to the target but somehow not being 
available to the currently-open searcher.

So this is very unlikely related to SOLR-11034 and SOLR-11035, never mind.

> Enabling bi-directional CDCR active-active clusters
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-11003
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11003
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: CDCR
>            Reporter: Amrit Sarkar
>            Assignee: Varun Thacker
>         Attachments: sample-configs.zip, SOLR-11003.patch, SOLR-11003.patch, 
> SOLR-11003.patch, SOLR-11003.patch, SOLR-11003.patch, 
> SOLR-11003-tlogutils.patch
>
>
> The latest version of Solr CDCR across collections / clusters is in 
> active-passive format, where we can index into source collection and the 
> updates gets forwarded to the passive one and vice-versa is not supported.
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/cross-data-center-replication-cdcr.html
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6273
> We are try to get a  design ready to index in both collections and the 
> updates gets reflected across the collections in real-time. 
> ClusterACollectionA => ClusterBCollectionB | ClusterBCollectionB => 
> ClusterACollectionA.
> The best use-case would be to we keep indexing in ClusterACollectionA which 
> forwards the updates to ClusterBCollectionB. If ClusterACollectionA gets 
> down, we point the indexer and searcher application to ClusterBCollectionB. 
> Once ClusterACollectionA is up, depending on updates count, they will be 
> bootstrapped or forwarded to ClusterACollectionA from ClusterBCollectionB and 
> keep indexing on the ClusterBCollectionB.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to