I'm afk right now but we should add a blurb about much faster document
deletes/updates in 7.0?

Mike

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:32 PM Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com> wrote:

> I will, thanks David.
>
> -Anshum
>
>
>
> On Sep 19, 2017, at 2:04 PM, David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I improved the Lucene notes on the wiki.  Presumably you'll pick up these
> changes when you publish the release.
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 4:45 PM Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com> wrote:
>
>> Please find the release notes here:
>>
>> Lucene: https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote70
>>
>> Solr: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote70
>>
>> I am cleaning up the ‘upgrading from 6x’ section to make it shorter but
>> feel free to either fix/add things to this. I pushed the artifacts last
>> night so there are still about 8 hours to the 24 hours period.
>>
>> I’ll use the 8 hours to fix the website etc. and announce once all of
>> this is wrapped up!
>>
>> -Anshum
>>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 28, 2017, at 10:46 PM, Varun Thacker <va...@vthacker.in> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think holding up the release process infinitely till we stabilize
>> all the tests is an option. On the other hand getting an RC to build is
>> pretty difficult ( I am facing the same problem with 6.6.1 ) and I am sure
>> people will run into this while voting for the release?
>>
>> We could identify the top 2/3 tests which fail regularly while building
>> the RC and either disable them or see if someone volunteers to fix them ?
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 2:53 AM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
>> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> > Those flaky Solr tests are annoying since people will also run into
>>> failures when
>>> > checking the RC? Should we disable these tests on the 7.0 branch so
>>> that building
>>> > and verifying this RC isn't annoying to everybody working on this
>>> release?
>>>
>>> +1. If it is hampering the release process, I think we should either not
>>> release without fixing them, or disable them for release (building,
>>> verifying).
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Though those failing tests are annoying, I would not recommend ignoring
>>>> those tests. We can manually ignore those test failures when we are testing
>>>> stuff out though.
>>>>
>>>> -Anshum
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 28, 2017, at 11:10 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Those flaky Solr tests are annoying since people will also run into
>>>> failures when checking the RC? Should we disable these tests on the 7.0
>>>> branch so that building and verifying this RC isn't annoying to everybody
>>>> working on this release?
>>>>
>>>> Le lun. 28 août 2017 à 19:23, Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com> a
>>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Adrien! It worked with a fresh clone, at least ant
>>>>> check-licenses worked, so I’m assuming the RC creation would work too.
>>>>> I’m running that, and it might take a couple of hours for me to create
>>>>> one, as a few SolrCloud tests are still a little flakey and they fail
>>>>> occasionally.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Anshum
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 28, 2017, at 10:13 AM, Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Adrien,
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, ant check-licenses fails with the same error, and so does ant
>>>>> validate (from the root dir). This is after running ant clean -f.
>>>>>
>>>>> BUILD FAILED
>>>>> /Users/anshum/workspace/lucene-solr/build.xml:117: The following error
>>>>> occurred while executing this line:
>>>>> /Users/anshum/workspace/lucene-solr/lucene/build.xml:90: The following
>>>>> error occurred while executing this line:
>>>>> /Users/anshum/workspace/lucene-solr/lucene/tools/custom-tasks.xml:62:
>>>>> JAR resource does not exist: analysis/icu/lib/icu4j-56.1.jar
>>>>>
>>>>> I didn’t realize that the dependency was upgraded, and what confuses
>>>>> me is that the file actually exists.
>>>>>
>>>>> anshum$ ls analysis/icu/lib/icu4j-5
>>>>> icu4j-56.1.jar  icu4j-59.1.jar
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems like it’s something that git clean, ant clean clean-jars etc.
>>>>> didn’t fix. This is really surprising but I’ll try and checking out again
>>>>> and creating and RC (after checking for the dependencies).
>>>>> I think ant should be responsible for cleaning this up, and not git so
>>>>> there’s something off there.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Anshum
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 28, 2017, at 8:51 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> You mentioned you tried to run the script multiple times. Have you run
>>>>> git clean at some point? Maybe this is due to a stale working copy?
>>>>>
>>>>> Le lun. 28 août 2017 à 08:53, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> a
>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Anshum,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does running ant check-licenses from the Lucene directory fail as
>>>>>> well? The error message that you are getting looks weird to me since 
>>>>>> Lucene
>>>>>> 7.0 depends on ICU 59.1, not 56.1 since
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7540.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Le ven. 25 août 2017 à 23:42, Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com> a
>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A quick question, in case someone has an idea around what’s going
>>>>>>> on. When I run the following command:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py --push-local
>>>>>>> /Users/anshum/solr/release/7.0.0/rc0 --rc-num 1 --sign <my-key>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I end up with the following error:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> BUILD FAILED
>>>>>>> /Users/anshum/workspace/lucene-solr/build.xml:117: The following
>>>>>>> error occurred while executing this line:
>>>>>>> /Users/anshum/workspace/lucene-solr/lucene/build.xml:90: The
>>>>>>> following error occurred while executing this line:
>>>>>>> /Users/anshum/workspace/lucene-solr/lucene/tools/custom-tasks.xml:62:
>>>>>>> JAR resource does not exist: analysis/icu/lib/icu4j-56.1.jar
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any idea as to what’s going on? This generally fails after the tests
>>>>>>> have run, and the script has processed for about 45 minutes and it’s
>>>>>>> consistent i.e. all the times when the tests pass, the process fails 
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> this warning.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can also confirm that this file exists at
>>>>>>> lucene/analysis/icy/lib/icu4j-56.1.jar .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has anyone else seen this when working on the release?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Anshum
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Aug 23, 2017, at 4:21 AM, Andrzej Białecki <
>>>>>>> andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 23 Aug 2017, at 13:06, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Keep in mind that there is also branch_7_0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Right, but the changes related to these issues were committed to
>>>>>>> master before branch_7_0 was created, and these specific issues are only
>>>>>>> about back-porting to 6x.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Uww
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 23. August 2017 12:26:42 MESZ schrieb "Andrzej Białecki" <
>>>>>>> a...@getopt.org>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 23 Aug 2017, at 08:15, Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I also found more issues when comparing 7x, with 6x this time. I’ll
>>>>>>>> take a look at wether it’s just the CHANGES entries or have these 
>>>>>>>> actually
>>>>>>>> missed the branch. I assume it’s just the CHANGES, but want to be 
>>>>>>>> sure. If
>>>>>>>> the committers involved can pitch in, I’d appreciate, else I’ll work on
>>>>>>>> this for a bit right now and continue with this tomorrow morning.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - SOLR-10477 (Ab)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is a partial back-port of relevant improvements from master to
>>>>>>>> 6x, so there are no strictly corresponding commits on 7x/master.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - SOLR-10631: Metric reporters leak on 6x. (Ab)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This one has been fixed as part of other related issues in branches
>>>>>>>> 7.x / master, so it only required a specific fix for 6x.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - SOLR-10000 (Ab)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This has been committed first to 7x, then to 6x and it’s present in
>>>>>>>> branch_6_6.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Andrzej Bialecki
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Uwe Schindler
>>>>>>> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
>>>>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Achterdiek+19,+28357+Bremen&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>>>>>> https://www.thetaphi.de
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
> Lucene/Solr Search Committer, Consultant, Developer, Author, Speaker
> LinkedIn: http://linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley | Book:
> http://www.solrenterprisesearchserver.com
>
>
> --
Mike McCandless

http://blog.mikemccandless.com

Reply via email to