You mentioned you tried to run the script multiple times. Have you run git clean at some point? Maybe this is due to a stale working copy?
Le lun. 28 août 2017 à 08:53, Adrien Grand <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi Anshum, > > Does running ant check-licenses from the Lucene directory fail as well? > The error message that you are getting looks weird to me since Lucene 7.0 > depends on ICU 59.1, not 56.1 since > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7540. > > Le ven. 25 août 2017 à 23:42, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> A quick question, in case someone has an idea around what’s going on. >> When I run the following command: >> >> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py --push-local >> /Users/anshum/solr/release/7.0.0/rc0 --rc-num 1 --sign <my-key> >> >> I end up with the following error: >> >> BUILD FAILED >> /Users/anshum/workspace/lucene-solr/build.xml:117: The following error >> occurred while executing this line: >> /Users/anshum/workspace/lucene-solr/lucene/build.xml:90: The following >> error occurred while executing this line: >> /Users/anshum/workspace/lucene-solr/lucene/tools/custom-tasks.xml:62: JAR >> resource does not exist: analysis/icu/lib/icu4j-56.1.jar >> >> Any idea as to what’s going on? This generally fails after the tests have >> run, and the script has processed for about 45 minutes and it’s consistent >> i.e. all the times when the tests pass, the process fails with this warning. >> >> I can also confirm that this file exists at >> lucene/analysis/icy/lib/icu4j-56.1.jar . >> >> Has anyone else seen this when working on the release? >> >> -Anshum >> >> >> >> On Aug 23, 2017, at 4:21 AM, Andrzej Białecki < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On 23 Aug 2017, at 13:06, Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Keep in mind that there is also branch_7_0. >> >> >> Right, but the changes related to these issues were committed to master >> before branch_7_0 was created, and these specific issues are only about >> back-porting to 6x. >> >> >> Uww >> >> Am 23. August 2017 12:26:42 MESZ schrieb "Andrzej Białecki" < >> [email protected]>: >>> >>> >>> On 23 Aug 2017, at 08:15, Anshum Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I also found more issues when comparing 7x, with 6x this time. I’ll take >>> a look at wether it’s just the CHANGES entries or have these actually >>> missed the branch. I assume it’s just the CHANGES, but want to be sure. If >>> the committers involved can pitch in, I’d appreciate, else I’ll work on >>> this for a bit right now and continue with this tomorrow morning. >>> >>> - SOLR-10477 (Ab) >>> >>> >>> This is a partial back-port of relevant improvements from master to 6x, >>> so there are no strictly corresponding commits on 7x/master. >>> >>> - SOLR-10631: Metric reporters leak on 6x. (Ab) >>> >>> >>> This one has been fixed as part of other related issues in branches 7.x >>> / master, so it only required a specific fix for 6x. >>> >>> - SOLR-10000 (Ab) >>> >>> >>> This has been committed first to 7x, then to 6x and it’s present in >>> branch_6_6. >>> >>> >>> --- >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Andrzej Bialecki >>> >>> >> -- >> Uwe Schindler >> Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen >> https://www.thetaphi.de >> >> >> >>
